movie thoughts: Ghostbusters (2016)
Aug. 18th, 2016 12:17 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

I saw Ghostbusters again yesterday at the budget theater down the street (you can't beat $4.50 for a movie ticket these days WOW!)
I still enjoyed it and found myself laughing out loud, looking forward to certain jokes and their delivery. I'm very happy with the movie overall. I really like that it has it's own story, that these characters are their own, not just female versions of the original team. I love how excited they get by science, their sheer joy in moments of discovery. I'm also really glad there was no romance, just Gilbert's hilariously bad flirtation with the always oblivious Kevin.
But on this second viewing, I did notice some clunky edits. There was definitely a HUGE chunk of relationship stuff cut between Erin and Abby. You can see the hints of it during there first conversation. There is an awkward cut where Abby says that the book is helping her pay the bills, but that really doesn't line up with what Erin had just said to her.
Later on, after they get "fake arrested" at the hotel, for some strange reason Erin is at her home, looking depressed and by herself, while the rest of the team is at their headquarters. Something must have transpired between the two in those deleted scenes that made them "break up", I'm guessing some kind of blow up about her losing her tenure which she never got properly upset about. Which doesn't seem like a big issue, but it does take away from the "You're back!" moment when Erin appears and pops the balloon. Even worse, it really hurts that finale, when Erin dives in after Abby and saves her, saying something along the lines of "I couldn't leave you again". This moment was clearly supposed to solidify a friendship in turmoil but all the turmoil had been edited out. I'm guessing the movie ran too long and this was the plot they decided to drop (which is fine because bickering best friends is pretty cliche) but unfortunately they had already shot the entire movie and must have been on a time crunch (perhaps preview audiences targeted that plot line?).
Anyway, clearly no effort was made to film additional scenes to make the pieces fit together better, which makes me think it was a last minute decision to tighten things up, remove an overly serious plot line from a goofy film and help things stay funny.
The one joke that did make me cringe was when Patty jumped into the audience and no one caught her. That, by itself, was a hilarious bit of physical comedy, but then she is lying there and says that she wasn't sure if it was a race thing or a woman thing. And that joke didn't work for me because we already had Abby jump into the crowd so clearly it wasn't a woman thing (or a weight thing, which was initially where I thought the joke would go), which makes it feel like a race thing and...I dunno, that moment made me a little uncomfortable but that might be just because of the current climate and me being hypersensitive.
My only other request is that for the sequel (which I really hope they make!) that Patty find the time to take some science classes. Perhaps the team tutors her while she goes to community college and gets a science degree. Or maybe the city gives her an honorary degree as part of being a Ghostbuster. Either way, I just do not want to see the "We're Scientists....and Patty" scene again. I know that was kind of fixed in the "We're Ghostbusters" moment, but I want Patty to be able to say she is a scientist, that she understands what is going on (I mean, obviously Holtzmann is on a whole different level than the rest of them, so not her). I just don't want the one person of color in the main cast to still not be a scientist.
Anyway, the movie was a lot better than I thought it was going to be and it held up well a second time. I felt like I had something in common with all the Ghostbusters but Holtzmann was my favorite over all. Probably because she was the most unique of the set. She is a mix of Ray and Egon - excited about all the science but also really smart and the creator of all of their toys. And awkward around everyone except for her new family.

(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-18 06:50 pm (UTC)Although as a Humanities professor, I think it would be kind of awesome if Patty's incredible and detailed historical knowledge got the respect it deserved -- like an honorary degree or something.
Ironically, it should be from Columbia, which is always kind of a jerk in Ghostbusters movies but is my grad school.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-20 07:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-20 07:59 pm (UTC)Interestingly, the CGI'ed Times Square they used had locations in it that haven't existed in years. So Patty's NYC is an AU. ;-)
(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-20 08:07 pm (UTC)That is hilarious! Takes a keen eyed New Yorker to catch that stuff! Were they locations that existed in the original Ghostbusters? What do you think the reason behind including them was?
(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-20 08:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-18 06:52 pm (UTC)Sadly you're not the first to mention the weird scene cuts & the somewhat hidden race thingy amongst other things... :/
(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-20 08:09 pm (UTC)Definitely worth the rental fee then, get some popcorn or maybe a big adult beverage to turn the nit-picky part of your brain off and watch it. I laughed both times and Sylvia and I are quoting it all the time.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-21 12:30 pm (UTC)I guess I will rent it this winter then... I made it a rule to only pay that much for movies, which I just really need the cinema feeling for. :D
(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-18 07:24 pm (UTC)I also thought that was a weird cut, and couldn't figure it out.
While it was the best movie ever, I did enjoy it.
And I <3 Holtzmann...SO MUCH
(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-20 08:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-18 07:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-20 08:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-19 01:35 am (UTC)FYI: the novelization by Nancy Holder is excellent, and an intriguing insight into some of the stuff you're talking about. It's not perfect--overall I do prefer the movie, especially since so much of what I love about Holtzmann comes straight from Kate McKinnon's performance--but yeah, check it out if you're missing those layers. (High school science fair shenanigans!!)
(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-20 08:11 pm (UTC)I saw the novelization at the library but it checked out before I could snag it! :D Which makes me happy because some little fangirl got her hands on it!
(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-20 10:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-19 02:39 am (UTC)I also cringed at the part where Patty dove into the crowd and didn't get caught.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-20 08:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-19 02:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-20 08:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-19 03:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-20 08:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-20 08:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-19 06:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-20 08:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-20 04:20 am (UTC)I haven't seen it, but I've heard it's choppy and tries too hard to be funny. Sounds like some people might prefer a "director cut" to the "theatrical release." I haven't felt very curious about it. I was heartbroken when Harold Ramis died, and haven't felt like more Ghostbusters in general.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-20 08:17 pm (UTC)The best thing about the second time was that I was able to catch even more references/homages to the original movies and the cartoon.
I really had no desire for this movie to happen, and when the trailer hit I didn't want to see it, but my friends dragged me and I had so much fun I wanted to see it a second time. It is a great homage to the original movie, with cameos all over the place (yes, even a little nod to Harold. They even dedicate the movie to him).
It's good for a giggle.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-08-25 05:16 am (UTC)I was pleasantly surprised by Ghostbusters as I usually don't get comedies.