orangerful: (Default)


Most of this movie, I just kept thinking "Yeah but...why Chris Pine?"

I just never found myself able to suspend my disbelief that Captain Kirk was now a Scottish Lord. Or that someone so pretty was a war hero in such a rough time. Robert the Bruce should have looked more weathered, more of the world. And he must have had better hair!

There was also a half second of me thinking "yeah but...why full frontal Chris Pine?" because was it really necessary to show him bathing in a river naked? Was this supposed to make me feel like he was one with the land? Because, again, I was more concerned with doing something about that awful hair.

Thank goodness for Florence Pugh, who elevates every movie she is in by a whole star rating. I'm starting to obsess over her. I am giving this movie 3 stars on Letterboxd because of her. Every moment she wasn't on screen was a missed opportunity, her character was far more fascinating than Bruce or the rest of the men - though this is probably the writer's trying to stay within what is known about the history and I'm going to guess (though I have no proof) that her life story probably is not so heavily documented so they felt they had more wiggle room while they needed to stay true to the history for Robert (if their Wikipedia articles are anything to go by, this is true)

Side note: Having seen 'Midsommar' last year, when, in 'Outlaw King' Pugh said the line "Alas we are but king and queen of the May", and then later on she slips a flower crown onto Robert's head, I couldn't help but giggle at this unintentional meta-joke for Pugh fans.

I've been told this was more faithful to the real history than 'Braveheart'. My husband loves this time period so he wanted to watch it but we both felt it suffered from having to cover TOO much in such a short time. I wish there had been some dates, a map, or anything to help us non-Scottish history experts to keep up with the timeline and troop movement. Just one simple cut away where it is a map and a finger and someone saying "Here we are and here they are". It just would have helped with understand the urgency of things, like hearing that the English troops are marching to battle, I thought "OH NO HERE THEY ARE" but really it was going to take them days, maybe longer, to get to where Bruce and his men were hiding. Especially with the King's son running around a lot, I could not figure out exactly how far away things were from each other.

By the end of the movie, I wanted to rewatch 'Last Kingdom' because for epic historical stories, I think the serial format is better than movie. You can only do so much in 2 hours. Cramming years of war and struggle into a few hours is not just a bad idea but really in injustice to the stories behind the scenes that make it all make sense.

But the biggest question I was left with is: Are there no Scottish actors?? So far we've had two very famous movies about Scottish heroes played by an Australian and an American. Why is this??
orangerful: (Default)


I feel like if you look up "There's a lot to unpack here" in the dictionary, this movie's poster should be used as the image. Because whoa.

It wants to be a lot of things:

It's part documentary about these kids that saw 'Raiders of the Lost Ark' in the 80s and decided they were going to remake it themselves and spent the next 7 years working on it on and off between school and life and such.

It's also part documentary about 3 of these kids as adults and how their relationships changed as they got older, how their dreams changed.

And IT IS ALSO a documentary about 2 of these guys attempting to get the final scene of the movie filmed 30 years later at great personal expense.

AND ONE MORE! It is also a documentary about the cult following their fan film got in the underground film community years later.

I'm not sure the movie set out to do what the guys involved intended it to do, but it is definitely an interesting study in obsession? Or perhaps also this weird issue with filling fulfilled and how people define themselves? It definitely got painful near the end when the one guy's past started to become more apparent with the abusive father and drug habit and the abuse towards his friend...

But when the climatic moment happened, all I could think was "What the hell are you guys doing anyway?"

And when that final note came on screen that said the one guy had quit his job and joined up with the other guy to start a film studio I was like "nooooooooo!!!" because that just seemed to be a really irresponsible thing to do with his family and kids and what not. It felt like the other guy convinced him to do it and we really had NO background on what he had done with his life, except he was unhappy.

Yeah, that's a lot. And I don't think it actually succeeds at any one of these things. BUT it does become an interesting artifact about real relationships and dynamics in groups. It becomes a story about obsession and adults trying to recapture some part of their youth. It is about how so many of us that grow up loving movies use them to fill a certain part of our life, even if we don't quite know what that part is.

I don't think the guys that put this together saw how this was going to reflect back on them. As the credits started rolling, I wasn't sure any of what happened in 2015 was a good idea.

Have you watched 'Raiders!' - what did you think?
orangerful: (starwars)
So, it's been a few weeks now and I've had time to ruminate a bit more on the latest Star Wars movie. If you didn't see my previous thread that linked to my twitter post, I can boil most of my feelings toward this movie as this:



And if you liked the movie - good on you. We all like different things. It doesn't make us less friends or more friends, we just have different tastes in films and how we approach certain stories.

I've talked with plenty of people that liked it and I think that it all boils down to what you wanted from this trilogy and this movie specifically.

ExpandI promise I won't ramble too long )
orangerful: (starwars)
Click the date to see the entire twitter thread. Only spoilers if you are swayed by opinions in gif format.

orangerful: (Default)
I'm not sure why I thought a fun thing to watch on my Saturday morning would be a movie about the Congressional investigation in the CIA's "enhanced interrogation techniques" but I'm going to blame Adam Driver, who I just really like and trust when it comes to choosing interesting roles.

The Report is an Amazon Studios film that chronicles the investigation, lead by Daniel Jones (Driver), into the CIA's torture of prisoners of war after the 9/11 attacks.

For a film that was 75% Adam Driver looking concerned/upset/frustrated, it was engrossing, probably because I only have a vague memory of these discussions happening around me when they actually happened. And I never did a deep dive into what was really going on. And I think I tend to think of the entire world of American politics flipping over every 4 years but the reality is, while the President and Congress might change, a lot of the people that run the big organizations stay in it because they are not appointed or elected, they just have their jobs.

And I always knew that different government departments didn't get along - my Dad worked for DOD for a long time - but I guess I didn't realize to what extent the animosity goes.

I doubt many people read Jones' 700 page report, but the fact that he could fill 700 pages says a lot. Everyone in this movie was fantastic and from what I can tell, it is relatively faithful to the facts. In the end, all we can do is own up to these mistakes but it is scary how easy they are to make and how LONG it can take for the truth to come out.

If you like political movies based on real events, where the tension and drama comes from putting the pieces together, I really recommend this one. Driver is fantastic, but so is Annette Bening as Senator Feinstein. Plus we see Jon Hamm, Jennifer Morrison, Michael C. Hall and other faces you'll recognize even if you don't know the actors names.

And if you have Prime, you can watch it streaming right now.
orangerful: (grrr)
So, this happened today.

I sat down to watch Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindlewald. I steeled myself because I knew the reviews for this were all over the place. But something about it bugged me right off the bat and I ended up sort of live-tweeting my viewing:



Yeah, I signed on for the misadventures of Newt Scamander, but instead it turns out this was just a Album Dumbeldore story.

Expandspoilers )

TL;DR if you skipped this one, you made the right choice. The more I think about ti, the more frustrated I get with what a huge, wasted opportunity this was.
orangerful: (car)
I had no intention of watching Fantastic Beasts. I had fallen out of love with the HP fandom after the 7th book. When it was announced it would be a 5-film series, I decided I wasn't interested in committing to yet another story set in Rowling's magical world. But then [livejournal.com profile] rogueslayer452 linked to Pop Culture Detective and I started watching the videos on that channel and stumbled upon this one:



So I picked up the DVD at work on Friday and watched it over the weekend.

side note: my new movie watching strategy is to pretend everything is a limited run Netflix series and just watch them in hour chunks. This idea used to bother me, felt like I was doing a disservice to the film maker's not watching their entire work in one sitting. But now I've decided that maybe their film makers and their editors are doing me the disservice because I don't have time for 2+ hour movies on a regular basis.

ANYWAY! I watched the movie and I did enjoy it!

Have some bullet points:

Expandspoilers )

Overall, despite my nitpicks, I enjoyed this movie a lot more than I thought I would but I would still only say 3 stars. I did put the sequel on hold to see if Redmayne's performance was altered at all. Hopefully I will have that for this coming weekend's breakfast viewing.

Did you see Fantastic Beasts? Has anyone seen any interviews with Redmayne or Yates or Rowling about this character of Newt Scamander and his portrayal in the movie? I'm wondering if this was all in JK's script or Yates' interpretation or just Redmayne's take on it.
orangerful: (browncoats)


There were lots of great taglines for ‘The Last Crusade’ but I think my favorite was “The Man with the hat is back. And this time, he’s bringing his Dad.”

‘Last Crusade’ was the first Indy movie I got to see in the theaters. I was 8 years old and already a hardcore Spielberg and Lucasfilm fan – I had all the Star Wars movies memorized, and knew most of ‘Temple of Doom’ by heart. ‘Raiders’, with it’s ghosts and melting Nazis, I had convinced myself, was too scary for me. (My theory is that the first ghost caught me off guard, sort of like the first ghost in ‘Ghostbusters’, which I didn’t watch from the very beginning for a LONG time because that memory of being scared kept me away).

I know we saw this in the theater. It wasn’t my first movie theater experience (I saw E.T. in the theater but have no memory of it except for things my Mom told me later), but I definitely don’t have the strong memories of seeing a movie with my whole family like I do with this one.

This was a world with no spoilers beyond the trailer, unless you searched for them. And by search, I don’t mean hopping on your computer. No, that Apple IIe did NOT have an internet connection just yet, or, at least, no world wide web to post your fan theories to. I’m sure I could have found some magazines with interviews and what not, but, again, 8. So I went into this movie just knowing that I loved Indiana Jones and had no idea what to expect beyond what Drew Struzan’s poster artwork told me.

So the opening sequence with a young Indy was a new idea. I didn’t really know who River Phoenix was so I didn’t see him as anything else but Young Indy. And then this happened:
Henry Jones Jr. gets his fedora and is magically turned into Indiana Jones.



Henry Jones Jr. gets his fedora and is magically turned into Indiana Jones.

and the movie really got started.

I don’t remember too much else about the viewing experience. Mostly just sitting in silence, probably munching on popcorn because how could you see an Indiana Jones movie without popcorn?

Yet, there is one moment, one scene, that I still remember, deep in my mind, deep in my gut, because of the reaction I had to it. When Donovan pulls the gun on Indy, threatening him to go in and find the Grail. Indy smirks and quips ” Shooting me won’t get you anywhere.” Donovan looks straight at him and says ” You know something, Dr. Jones? You’re absolutely right.” and then…



Donovan pivots ever so slightly and shoot Indy’s Dad.

Right – so I’m 8 years old here. I don’t know movie tropes. I don’t realize that Steven Spielberg doesn’t kill a Dad. I don’t understand that Indiana Jones movies are not going to go that dark. All I know is that Indy’s Dad just got shot. I remember feeling my guts squeeze, the heart stop, and my eyes just filling with tears. I remember my Mom leaning over, sort of giving me a rub on the back and perhaps whispering that it would be okay or not to worry or something along those lines. Something to calm me down so I didn’t lose it completely.

I believe once I saw that Henry was stable and talking, that Marcus was going to hold that little cloth over the wound, I calmed down, hopeful that Indy would save the day.

Of course, there was a happy ending (unless you were a Nazi, but then you don’t deserve one, do you?) and like all good stories, the heroes ride off into the sunset, laughing and smiling, with John Williams’ classic theme playing.



Since then, I have watched the movie many many times. I quote it constantly, especially the classic “No ticket.” line. I could probably act out entire scenes if I needed to. It is perfect from beginning to end. No downtime, no throwaway scenes, all of it important for the story.

I grew up in the 80s and 90s, straddling the Gen-X and Millenial line. I didn’t get to experience Star Wars or the first two Indiana Jones’ films in their initial theater releases, and I’d say this movie marks the end of that Lucas/Spielberg summer domination era in some ways. Speilberg went on to make some fantastic, but heavier, films. Lucas waited another ten years to go back to a galaxy far far away. I’m so glad I saw this in the theater and have this memory, even if it was a bit of a traumatic one. This was the last great summer romp before both creators matured and grew apart.

If you haven’t seen this movie in awhile, sit down and watch it again. Turn out all the lights, pop some corn and settle in. 30 years later, it is still a lot of fun keeping up with the Joneses.

What are your Indiana Jones memories? Please comment or link to your post! I’d love to chat with other Indy fans.
orangerful: (belters)
One of Tim's co-workers told him he should watch Logan's Run.

I don't know why they told him that. Perhaps he was talking about getting older. Or maybe they were just talking films from childhood or something. But anytime Tim actually *wants* to watch a movie, I jump on it because it is so rare, plus I force him to watch so many random things, it seems only fair.

So...yeah...after watching that, a movie that came out in 1976, I totally understand why Star Wars blew people's minds. The effects alone...

Also, I'm pretty sure the female character technically wasn't wearing underwear for the whole movie, which made me cringe anytime she sat down on the ground. They did put nude panties on the poor girl so when "fight scenes" happened, she didn't risk flashing everything. But later they had to strip for "reasons" and she definitely did not have panties on at all.

Note: I noticed this. Tim did not.

Valuable lesson here about animals in movies - cats are a bad choice. Logan is trying to have a SERIOUS conversation and the cat behind him is begging for pets, bumping its head into his arms until someone off screen must have clicked at it because it looked up and off in the distance. And in the background, there were at least two cats taking baths. It's just hard to focus with cats wandering the set.

I'm sure the book is better or at least gives more details? The movie doesn't give you any background for the society, how it functions, who the leader is etc. just that they are killed at 30 and like having sex...a lot. Somehow they live in this domed city and no one has bothered to invent any other past times except for sex and watching your friends maybe-not-die.

Another concern: if they don't have babies themselves in this domed land, how do their bodies even work? Can they even have children the normal way (this was my first concern when they were all free at the end)?

Michael York's haircut = Mark Hamill's haircut and it was very distracting. Also, in his all black outfit, he looked like RotJ Luke. Honestly, the whole time I was watching, I just really wanted to watch Star Wars.


(yeah, I can't imagine why I kept thinking of Star Wars...)

I did like their super sci-fi future version of what was basically Tinder. Except it was like Tinder with transporter technology which seems like the worst idea ever. I was impressed by the whole idea of consent being front and center though. Jessica kept saying "it is my choice" and Logan would say "yes" and he mostly listened. I mean, he put some pressure on but there wasn't any kissing or touching until she agreed to it all much much later. So for a cheesy sci-fi movie, it had that going for it. Even if she showed up pretty much naked and he was wearing a large snuggie.



I've seen it now. I mean, I knew the whole set up for the movie before we started watching it and then they went ahead and pretty much gave you 75% of the set up on the first screen:



And it wasn't like we doubted Logan's motives, as soon as they age him up 4 years to his "last day" he's like "oh screw this Imma RUN!" so there wasn't even this whole "will they won't they".

You know what did it better, so many years later? Scott Westerfeld's "Uglies" book series. He clearly watched Logan's Run and then that episode of Twilight Zone, then blended them in his brain.

Why while I will never watch 'Logan's Run' again, at least I can credit it for a lot of the dystopian stories I ended up enjoying later.

(while googling for pictures, I saw an article saying a remake was "coming soon" but that was in 2015 so I guess they realized they missed the "dystopia bubble" and shelved the project.)
orangerful: (Default)
I did make a bunch of end-of-the-year posts in December to wrap up the year. But I was so excited about my paid Wordpress "public" blog, that I forgot to post them here!!!! **facepalm**

I mean, most of the stuff you've heard me babble about in other posts one by one, but sometimes it is nice to have them all in one place.

And I made such pretty graphics too!!!

Not sure I can copy+paste all the code without making a mess, so I'm just going to be annoying and link you to the Wordpress posts. But I shall include the pretty graphics because hotlinking those is easy.

Next time I will post in ALL THE PLACES! My apologies actual online friends!

My 2018 Movies


My favorite books of 2018


My favorite video games of 2018


Though if you want to subscribe to my Wordpress blog...I wouldn't be upset. I even splurged and paid so I could use my ULR www.orangerful.com - so easy to remember when you're bored and need something to read! :D

OFF TO GET MY NEW PHONE!!!!!!
orangerful: (senua)


Finally watched this. I read the book when it first came out and it was just such a fantastic book. I was worried that translating it to film wouldn't work but the movie manages to be a faithful adaptation in most respects - a few scenes are removed or take place "off camera" due to length - but the important bits are there.

What really struck me was my reaction to *seeing* this story rather than just reading it. The book is told from Starr's point of view, first person, and she spends a lot of time feeling confused, angry, and lost and so, as a reader, I also felt that way. But watching the movie and seeing her face (the amazing Amandla Stenburg)as she worked through each emotion, I was hit hardest with the true sadness of the whole situation. When you saw her fighting the tears, visibly shaking, and then just crying. Or watching the determination in her face grow as she makes a decision.

And I think watching the movie made me think about some of my own unconscious biases. In my head, the cop looked one way when everything happened, but on film, they cast a young guy and he acted a little nervous/jump about the whole thing. Even little things, like all the tattoos Starr's father has, I probably didn't imagine those every time he appeared while reading, but you can't miss them in the movie. And, of course, the reality of the protest scenes...I think when I was reading the book, a part of me wanted to see things as right/wrong but that's not reality and I think the movie did a good job of not picking sides but just showing the situation, what it triggers within a community, and how that can erupt into violence even when people want a peaceful protest.

A very good companion to the book and I would urge everyone to read the book and watch the movie. And then have some conversations.
orangerful: Santa Yoda felt your presents (star wars)
Look at me! Only a week into 2019 and I've watched two movies! I'm hoping to get through two more this weekend because I need to return everything Monday.

Anyway, wanted to give some brief, non-spoilery thoughts (though if I go into spoilers, I hide them under a cut, so you have been warned!)

Untitled

This had been on my to-watch list for awhile, all I knew about it was what was on the cover and that it had fantastic reviews.

It is a documentary about three guys who find out they were triplets separated at birth! There is SO much more to it, but it is best to just watch the film and see everything unfold, piece by piece. Every time I thought this thing was coming to a close, some new bit of information came out that kept me in my seat.

I got the DVD from the library, doesn't look like anyone has the streaming rights just yet, but it is worth the rental price.

SPOILERS under the cut, for sure, DO NO CLICK if you haven't seen it!
ExpandRead more... )

Because it is a documentary, so many things are left unanswered because the people who know the truth are either dead or have buried the records. And if viewers feel frustrated by this, think how upsetting it has to be for the people whose lives are directly effected by all of these dangling threads.
orangerful: (force awakens)
Tim is sick *again*. Hoping I don't catch it. Bonus is that we are going to drive out to see his family next week so we will be in the car ~13 hours...yeah I'm going to get it, aren't I?

He's driving me a little crazy right now because he is sitting behind me playing a game rather than in bed. He took the bedtime cold medicine over an hour again! It's going to be weak by the time he gets in bed. :\

BUT IT IS THE WEEKEND! AND I FINALLY READ ALL OF YOUR ENTRIES!

I feel like I just got my work groove back after all the short holiday weeks at the end of December. And also I was kind of spent at work so I read a lot of LJ/DW entries while drinking my hot chocolate this morning.

And then I treated myself on the way home with this:



I mean, I need something for that 13 hour car ride! I didn't play the original because who the heck owned a Wii U? It's one of the systems I never got (but believe me, I thought about it a lot!). It came out today so I bought it, which I can't even tell you the last time I actually picked up a game on the release date...maybe Mass Effect 3? Or was it Dragon Age Inquisition? Either way, it's been awhile!

I played it for a bit tonight while watching the last hour+ of BlacKKKlansbman. Did anyone else see this? I read the memoir and I was actually impressed by how close the script stayed to the true story. They could have gone overboard and created more scenarios for Ron to go through, but they kept it close, just letting the viewer marvel at how freaking insane all of it was. Though be warned, the last 5 minutes will mess you up. The messed me up. I wasn't ready. I don't want to spoil it but just...but ready.

So that is my first movie of 2019. A whole stack of DVDs showed up for me at the library because I had them all set to unsuspend after January 7th and I was apparently number 1 in line for EVERYTHING LOL. But with Tim sick and the weather being meh, it feels like a good weekend to maybe watch some movies while playing a video game hehe.

OR practicing my guitar! I didn't do all of my goals every day, but I did pretty well. I kept my Duolingo streak, exercised 3 days and practiced the guitar 3 days. I was rocking those first 3 strings today LOL. If you want to hear a really choppy version of "Ode to Joy", I can totally hook you up!! I just want to get the basics down before I try Rocksmith again. For those that don't know, Rocksmith is a video game but you use your actual guitar. But I always felt like I didn't know where my fingers were and I'd get really frustrated. So now I'm using a really basic "teach yourself guitar" book and just trying to learn how to hold it and play the notes without staring at my fingers. Then we can move on to "Pour Some Sugar On Me". :P

Okay, time to crawl into bed with a good book (City of Stairs, thanks for the rec [personal profile] colls, I'm about 90 pages in and it's got me hooked)
orangerful: (force awakens)
It's a quiet night at the library so I thought I would begin to type up my reaction to TLJ...and I'm up to two pages of notes in Google Docs. So rather than posting a TL;DR length ramble, I'm going to break it up into chunks. Consider this part 1 of whatever haha.

Spoilers, obviously.

Expanda long time ago...I mean, seriously it's been almost three weeks since I watched it! )
orangerful: (kermit)
This list isn't that very impressive either but I keep meaning to share what I watched!


My Life as a Zucchini
At just over an hour long, this movie is a perfect little story about a young boy adjusting to life in a group home. I watched it in French with subtitles, even though some big names stepped up to dub the film for the U.S. release after it got such rave reviews overseas.

Beautiful animation done in classic stop-motion style. I love the character designs. I was sad when it was over because I wanted to follow more of Zucchini's story.

Just know that this is not a children's movie even though the main characters are kids. It's not a happy fluffy bunny story, these kids are in the home because they did things or bad things happened to them, so you want to make sure those viewing the film are ready to hear about such things.


To Kill a Mockingbird
Confession: I have not read this book. It wasn't assigned to my class in high school. So I was going into this with only a bare minimum of knowledge - I knew that Scout was the main character and that a court case happened and there was a guy named Boo Radley.

Books into movies are tricky things - I low Scout is the narrator of the book, but I'd say the movie felt like it switched between her, Jem, and Atticus. Even though I haven't read the book, I could feel that things were missing from the world, but at 2 hours not much more could have been added.

I am not sure how I feel about the ending, it felt rushed and maybe the book offers more by way of closure but the movie felt like it just wanted to wrap things up quickly. Plus, the odd issue of Atticus fighting for justice doled out int he courtroom and having the finale be justice happening on the "street"?

Yet again, another "old" movie that is still upsettingley relevant to what is happening in our country today. Why has so little changed.


Nocturnal Animals
I don't even know what to say. That was an emotional experience... Is it just me or is Jake Gyllenhaal really into movies that make you go "WTF!?" when the credits roll? Amy Adams seems to be getting into that too, at least with this and 'Arrival'. I really want to read the book that "inspired" the movie to see what more it has to say about the relationships but this movie was mesmerizing in an really upsetting way. It haunted me the same way Susan was haunted each time she put the book down. Not at all what I was expecting.

More reviews on my Letterboxd!

Have you seen any of these? What were your thoughts! Feel free to link in comments!
orangerful: (fotc - favorite box)
La La Land poster Yup, finally watched this. I had hoped for so much more but I knew it was overrated when the Oscar buzz started flying around.

I mean, it was a movie about making movies. It homaged lots of classics. But it never even gets close to the level they were. Heck, John Legend's character even chides Gosling's for being obsessed with OLD jazz and not embracing anything new, asking how they can save the music by holding on to the past? Yes, those movies are classics, they were groundbreaking, but when you just try to recreate them, you can't hold a candle to them - we don't have a Fred and Ginger now. We don't have a Gene Kelly. Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling are both great but they are not that multitalented.

Don't get me wrong - the only reason this movie was so well liked it because of Stone and Gosling. I adore both of them, it made watching the whole thing a lot more fun. I mean, they really are not singers, they are barely dancers, but I didn't care because THOSE EYES. On both of them - THOSE EYES!

And this scene was, by far, my most favorite scene:



But, yeah. I can't deny it had some beautiful cinematography so I'm okay with that award. I'm also okay that it didn't win best picture because it was no where near as good as 'Moonlight'. It's a pretty forgettable movie. Even the songs didn't do much for me. Or maybe it was just one song?

But, yeah, since I adore Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling, I didn't mind spending two hours in a dark room with them.

But, yeah, pretty much this:

orangerful: (bsg - wishful drinking)
13 Reasons Why Promo Image by Netflix

Warning: spoilers for the entire series and also lots of trigger-y topics, though I'm not going to go into detail

ExpandRead more... )
orangerful: (fotc - favorite box)
I had been looking forward to this adaptation of Patrick Ness' young adult novel A Monster Calls since it was announced. It just felt like the kind of story that would work well on screen. I was very happy with the results.

Just like the book, this is a visually gorgeous tale (Jim Kay's illustrations reminded me a lot of Stephen Gammel's artwork in Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark). It is a coming of age story wrapped in a fairy tale. Conor's mother is very sick and he is dealing with it about as well as you would expect a young boy to deal with it. He buries himself in his artwork and conjures up The Monster, who visits him at night and tells him a story. With each story, Conor begins to peel away the fairy tale world and begins to see that the real world is not so simple. That there are always layers, that acceptance is a part of life and so is great pain.

It is bittersweet and even though I had read the book, I still found myself crying in the end. Everyone did a fabulous job, but Liam Neeson as The Monster was just perfect casting (and according to the extras, he was the one and only choice).

The only flaw in the movie was the casting of Sigourney Weaver since I felt her British accent wasn't so great. But luckily her character doesn't actually talk very much as most of the story rests on Conor's shoulders.

If you have tissues handy, I highly recommend this one.
orangerful: (one girl // orangerful)


This movie was such a surprise because, honestly, I was worried it might just be a boring courtroom drama. But this was well written, well acted, and very well directed. The entire cast was amazing.

Based on a true story, Historian/Writer/Professor Deborah Lipstadt was brought to court by "historian" David Irving for libel back in the late 1990s. She mentioned his Holocaust denial in her book about the issue, saying how he misconstrued the facts to fit this narrative that the Holocaust did not happen. The catch - Irving is British and he charges Lipstadt in the high courts so the burden of proof is left to Lipstadt and her team.

I really wish this movie had not felt so relevant as I watched it this morning, almost twenty years from the start of the lawsuit. These arguments about hate speech vs free speech, about having "alternative facts" and about being in denial about what is right and wrong...it rang just as true today.

The point of the film, the idea of letting justice and truth and facts speak for themselves, is scary because so many debates about things like the Holocaust and racism and prejudice get very emotional. This is what Lipstadt has to deal with for much of the movie, finding a way to get the emotional release she needs while letting her lawyers navigate the legal system.

I definitely recommend this one.
orangerful: (one girl // orangerful)
"This is a rebellion. I rebel" says Jyn Erso in the Rogue One trailer.

Except she doesn't say this in the movie. In fact, a lot of things shown and said in the trailers for Rogue One never made it to the big screen. (for an in-depth look at the movie that wasn't, check out this great Slashfilm article)

I will say that this is the BEST of the Star Wars prequel films. I would not rank it anywhere with the classic trilogy and I still found Force Awakens more fun and engaging.

Expandmore thoughts, with spoilers )

I didn't hate it, I enjoyed the movie for the most part. I'd rather watch it than AoTC again. I think it is cool that they made a Star Wars movie that didn't rely on a sequel or Jedi. But there was a lot of potential for this film to be much more than it was but I think they were distracted by the same things that got Lucas during the prequels - the ability to use CGI in new ways. If they had focused less on that and more on the real people and their stories, Rogue One could have been a much stronger film.

3.5 out of 5 stars

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
5 67891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

Expand All Cut TagsCollapse All Cut Tags