orangerful: (gollum not listening // orangerful)
[personal profile] orangerful
who, I ask you, WHO would wear this!

Honestly, who would wear this? It's not even attractive! And WHY WHY would a company make it for teenagers! $500 for that? There's not even $500 worth of material in it!

ugh.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-31 05:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] orangerful.livejournal.com
my thoughts exactly. I graduated high school back in '99 but teens can't have become that stupid, can they??

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-31 07:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dancingsalad.livejournal.com
that was on fark a week or so ago

they noted that the NY post article was fudging it a little....the manufacturer intended the dress to be worn the OTHER way around.

the woman in the picture is using the backstraps as....front..straps? so yeah...improper usage...flag on the play...

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-31 04:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] orangerful.livejournal.com
can you find that article for me? I'd like to see the dress the "correct" way. Might still be fugly but at least not indecent.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-31 11:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] orangerful.livejournal.com
yeah, honestly, it's still a fugly, slutty dress. Does nothing for the girls figure and she's like a size 4!!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-31 08:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kimberleym.livejournal.com
GAHHH! That's just wrong. SICK and WRONG!!!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-31 07:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maybemanda.livejournal.com
ha, i saw this awhile ago. looks about the same to me whether its frontwards or backwards.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-31 11:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] orangerful.livejournal.com
i agree, ugly either way. Yuck-o.

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
5 67891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags